主站首页 | 本所概况 | 新闻动态 | 本所学人 | 学术前沿 | 本所成果 | 人才培养 | 学术刊物 | 基地管理 | 清史纂修 | 清风学社网站 | 热门信息
  
中心概况 中心成员 新闻动态 中心活动 学术前沿 教学研究 联系我们
站内搜索: 请输入文章标题或文章内容所具有的关键字 整站文章 中国人民大学生态史研究中心
 您现在的位置:首页 >> 中国人民大学生态史研究中心 >> 新闻动态
生态史中心参加ASEH旧金山会议(2014年3月12日-16日)
来源: 生态史    作者: 生态史  更新时间:2014/03/23 点击数:

生态史中心参加ASEH旧金山会议

2014312日-2014年3月16日

Center for Ecological History at International ASEH Conference in San Francisco,

12-16 March 2014


Every year the American Society for Environmental History invites members and friends from all around the globe, to present their research, discuss ideas, and meet old and new friends. At this year's event the Center for Ecological History at RUC was also well represented.


Thursday morning, a keynote round table under the title, “Lost in Translation: Environmental History in a Global Context,” discussing challenges for global environmental history was to kick start the conference. The plenary session sponsored by the Rachel Carson Center for Environment and Society (RCC) featured the center's affiliate scholars Hou Shen (RUC), Donald Worster (RUC), and Christof Mauch (RCC Munich), alongside Claudia Leal (Universidad de los Andes – Bogota, Columbia), and John Agbonifo (in absentia; Osun State University – Osagbo, Nigeria)), the session was moderated by David Biggs (University of California - Riverside).

Responding to the increasing attention environmental history has gained especially over the last decade, this plenary was designed to address the scholarly consequences of this trend. The multi-national practitioners gave insights into their own work in cross-cultural and cross-language research. Here, the Chinese example in particular stimulated the audiences' curiosity, as cultural and linguistic differences are obvious. But all participants had experienced struggles in translating the predominant ideas and norms in other cultural and linguistic contexts. For example: How does one translate such terms as nature, conservation, and wilderness? As especially the latter one turned out problematic for Latin American scholars, as their language does not provide any equivalent concept. Other challenges faced by international researchers trying to foster the growing of the field, and implementing a supporting academic infrastructure in their national contexts are mainly availability of scholarly resources and limited funds, what in return affects the international outreach.


The same day afternoon, the session “ China and the West in 20th Century Environmental History,” organized by Donald Worster provided the interested audience an overview about the current leading research on environmental history there. Chaired by Robert Marks (Whittier College, USA), the panel consisted of China's leading experts in the field: Xia Mingfang (Renmin University of China), Mei Xueqin (Tsinghua University,), Guo Gaorong (Chinese Academy of Social Sciences).

Xia Mingfang's initial presentation addressed “The Republican Revolution of China in the Transformation of the Global Ecologial System,” he especially pointed at the importance of super structure of disasters. Mei Xueqin presented a Beijing regional case study “The Machine in the Valley: British Mechanization of the Chinese Coal Industry and Its Environmental Effects.” Looking at the Mentougou Coal mine, she not only identified the social challenges of environmental destruction, but also changes in consumption patterns, directly related to foreign involvement. In the third paper, “Chinese Reflections of on the Dust Bowl and the 1930s Crisis in American Agriculture,” Gao Guorong looked at Chinese coverage of the event, as well as an exchange in expertise, here featuring Lowdermilk for the Sino-American cooperation in soil conservation at Dacheng.

The concluding discussion reflected the global interest in Chinese environmental historical topics. As inspired by all three presentations the deep entanglement of national environmental histories became apparent. The first two case studies in particular emphasized the state as semi-colony, and the role of foreign capital. They showcased the global ecological integration of China already in the late 19th and early 20iest century. It also became clear, how fruitful comparative approaches are, especially in the context of industrializing China.


All in all the ASEH was a great success for the CEH.



  热门信息
代表性成果 - Represe...
侯 深
东亚环境史协会征稿!截至9.3...
“全球研究”系列讲座——危机与...
夏明方
生态史研究辑刊 - Journ...
Christof Mauch
Donald Worster
  最新信息
征稿启事 | “悬崖之上:环境...
首届“环境人文学”青年学者工作...
夏明方|李文海:为哀鸿立命
【史学前沿 第13讲】刘文明&...
人大青年史学坊||劳动的水牛&...
会议通知 | “一切始于人类的...
讲座预告 | 何鲁三像...
【史学前沿 第12讲】杜宣莹&...
  专题研究
中国历史文献学研究
近世秘密会社与民间教派研究
近世思想文化研究
清代中外关系研究
清代边疆民族研究
中国历史地理研究
清代经济史研究
清代政治史研究
清代社会史研究
中国灾荒史论坛
  研究中心
中国历史文献学研究
近世秘密会社与民间教派研究
近世思想文化研究
清代中外关系研究
清代边疆民族研究
中国历史地理研究
清代经济史研究
清代政治史研究
清代社会史研究
中国灾荒史论坛
友情链接
版权所有 Copyright@2003-2007 中国人民大学清史研究所 Powered by The Institute of Qing History
< 本版主持:宋 瞳 顾问:乌云必力格教授 > < 关于本站 | 联系站长 | 版权申明 >
您是本站第 位访客,京ICP备05020700号